About this Show

State of the Union

News/Business. Candy Crowley. CNN's Candy Crowley takes an in-depth look at the news.

NETWORK
CNN

DURATION
01:01:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Channel v759

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
1920

PIXEL HEIGHT
1080

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Benghazi 23, Us 16, Clinton 11, Irs 8, Tammy Duckworth 4, Joe Lieberman 4, Boston 4, Libya 4, Susan Collins 4, Ted 4, Cleveland 4, Ariel Castro 3, Maxwell 3, Crowley 3, Gabbard 3, Pickering 3, Fareed Zakaria 3, Washington 3, Thomas Pickering 2, Greg 2,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  CNN    State of the Union    News/Business. Candy Crowley. CNN's Candy  
   Crowley takes an in-depth look at the news.  

    May 12, 2013
    9:00 - 10:01am PDT  

9:00am
next sunday we will have another look at the media. "state of the union" with candy crowley begins now. double trouble for the administration, benghazi and the irs. >> today the irs admits the agents targeted tea party group for extra scrutiny. >> i don't think you accidentally focus on the tea party but it wouldn't be the first time the irs has been used for political purposes. >> our exclusive with susan collins of maine on the irs and benghazi. >> the white house has done everything possible to block access to the information that would outline the truth. >> before, during and after the attack. former ambassador thomas pickering is part of a panel that looked in it to all. he joins us. and a shocking pentagon report estimating 25,000 sexual assaults are committed every year in military. >> this is not only a crime
9:01am
against the victim. this is a betrayal to your unit. >> the problem and the fix with two iraq war veterans serving on capitol hill. hawaii's gabbert and tammy duckworth of illinois. and our panel on tea parties in the irs, republicans and benghazi, rand paul and hillary clinton. i'm candy crowley. this is "state of the union." joining me now senator susan collins of maine. thank you, senator collins, for being here. here's what we know so far about the irs. we will have an inspector generals report some time next week. we'll told in that report will show an irs official has said in fact, yes, there was extra scrutiny or singling out of groups with the words tea party or patriot in it as far back as 2011 we are told. senior officials knew this at the irs and didn't tell congress. we are also told by the director of these tax exempt
9:02am
organizations inside the irs that this was done as a shortcut and not out of "political bias." is this passing the smell test for you? >> not at all. this is truly outrageous. and it contributes to the profound distrust that the american people have in government. it is absolutely chilling that the irs was singling out conservative groups for extra review. and i think that it's very disappointing that the president hasn't personally condemned this and spoken out. his spokesman has said it should be investigated, but the president needs to make crystal clear that this is totally unacceptable in america. >> the white house did put out a thing saying this doesn't meet the standards, if it doesn't meet the standards of government officials should be backed and taken they blame a small group of agents, but the fact remains
9:03am
that any time you mention the irs -- by the way, tea party groups complained about this at the time. and we should just explain to our viewers that groups get tax exempt status as social interest groups. if they're involved in politics, they don't get the same tax exempt status and that's what this part of the irs does. in sort of reiterating what you said "the washington post" said it was appalling to learn friday that the irs improperly target conservative groups for scrutiny. it was almost as disturbing president obama treasury secretary jack lew have not personally apologized to the american people and promised a full investigation". public apology needed here? >> absolutely. i just don't buy this was a couple of rogue irs employees. after all, groups with progressive in their names were not targeted similarly. there's evidence that higher
9:04am
level supervisors were aware of this. and the irs was not forthcoming in telling congress about the problem. if it had been just a small group of employees, then you would think that the high level irs supervisors would have rushed to make this public, fired the employees involved and apologize to the american people and informed congress. none of that happened in a timely way. >> one of the things we should mention is that the head of the irs did come up at some point, i believe last year or the year before, and said, no, we are not targeting folks for political reasons ever. he was a bush-appointee, so that does mix up the politics a bit. and we should say there's no evidence linking him to knowing about this. we only know that senior officials according to some of what we've seen about this inspector general, we only know senior officials and not necessarily the director at the time.
9:05am
>> that's true, but it's evident that some senior officials did know about it and have known about it for some time. the allegations go back at least two years. so that is very troubling. >> let me turn you to boston and something senator joe lieberman, who you've worked with very closely to put together the homeland security department and try to put together an entire structure that in fact connected dots. this is something he said, i think, testifying on capitol hill recently about boston. >> from what i've learned over the years about home-grown islamist terrorism, i believe that though it would not have been easy, it was possible to have prevented the terrorist attacks in boston. >> do you think it was possible to have prevented the terrorist attacks?
9:06am
>> it's very difficult to know. i worked very closely with joe lieberman and have enormous respect for his views. and we held a series of hearings on the growing threat of home-grown terrorists. i believe that better information sharing might have allowed us to prevent this attack. first of all, i don't think there was aggressive enough follow-up when the russians first alerted the fbi to the fact that these two brothers were becoming increasingly radicalized. now, we don't get tips from the russians every day. this isn't like the canadians or the brits. >> flags should have gone up you think. >> absolutely. a huge one. >> let me ask you about something one of your colleagues, senator inhouse said on the radio lately. he was talking not just about what happened in benghazi now, but about the e-mails afterwards and the changing of the talking points. as you know there's a hearing on the house side about benghazi.
9:07am
here's what senator inhofe had to say. >> may be using the i word before long. >> you mean impeachment? >> yeah. this is clearly an orchestrated cover-up. >> do you see something in benghazi either in the handling before, during or after with the talking points that were scrubbed that the "i" word, the impeachment word should come up? >> i don't at this point i will say. but that doesn't mean that these allegations aren't serious. joe lieberman and i did a preliminary investigation into the events into the attacks on benghazi last fall. and we had a career cia agent who was the woman who first drafted the very first talking points tell us that there was no national security reason for the
9:08am
line about the links to al qaeda to have been dropped from the talking points. so clearly politics was at play here. >> if that is so, is it not a cover-up on a scale of -- i mean, why do you think they would do this? do you think it was to help the president get elected? >> i believe that because we were in the midst of the final weeks of a very contentious presidential re-election campaign that one of the themes of this administration was that libya was a success, that the military invention had produced a stable pro-united states country that was moving toward democracy and that al qaeda was on the run. and what happened in benghazi proved that neither of those narratives was accurate. >> as you know, there have been
9:09am
those ambassador pickering among others who said i learned nothing new in the hearings this week. did you learn anything new about benghazi? and what don't you know you want to know? >> i did learn something new. there were further further itterration s and changes in the talking points than i've been aware of. in addition, the whole discussion of whether or not help could have been sent in time is a discussion that joe lieberman and i had, but which congressman issa took to a new and important level. i think it's extraordinary that the head of africom general ham told our committee he had no idea how many americans were even in benghazi and would need to be evacuated if something happened even though he is the person who would be in charge of the evacuation. and we have to remember that there were many hours between the first attack and the latter
9:10am
attack. i don't think we could have gotten help there in time to save the ambassador and the information officer, but i do believe help could have been sent in time to prevent the further deaths. and indeed there was a plane from tripoli of very brave security officers coming to benghazi who were held up by the libyans for three hours at the airport. and we still don't have a good answer as to why. >> so more investigation as far as your concerned is needed? >> absolutely. >> senator susan collins, thanks for joining us. >> thank you. >> up next, while republicans focused on hillary clinton in the benghazi hearings, an accountability review board that investigated the attack declined to single out the former secretary of state for what went wrong. the man who led that inquiry, ambassador thomas pickering is next. >> we've seen specific parts of the arb that are either incomplete or in fact are just wrong.
9:11am
we've also heard live testimony that the arv did not assign blame above, if you will, mid-level management. ♪ [ female announcer ] from more efficient payments. ♪ to more efficient pick-ups. ♪ wireless is limitless.
9:12am
it'll cause cavities, bad breath. patients will try and deal with it by drinking water. water will work for a few seconds but if you're not drinking it, it's going to get dry again. i recommend biotene. all the biotene products like the oral rinse...the sprays have enzymes in them. the whole formulation just works very well. it leaves the mouth feeling fresh. if i'm happy with the results and my patients are happy with the results, i don't need to look any farther. i got this. [thinking] is it that time? the son picks up the check?
9:13am
[thinking] i'm still working. he's retired. i hope he's saving. i hope he saved enough. who matters most to you says the most about you. at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners, and they matter most to us. whether you're just starting your 401(k) or you are ready for retirement, we'll help you get there. email marketing from constant contact reaches people in a place they're checking every day -- their inbox. and it gives you the tools to create custom emails that drive business. it's just one of the ways constant contact can help you grow your small business. sign up for your free trial today at constantcontact.com/try. [ female announcer ] from meeting customer needs...
9:14am
to meeting patient needs... ♪ wireless is limitless. ...and we inspected his brakes for free. -free is good. -free is very good. [ male announcer ] now get 50% off brake pads and shoes at meineke. joining me now ambassador thomas pickering, chair of the state department's accountability review board on the benghazi terror attacks. ambassador, thank you so much. >> thank you, candy. >> it's been a busy week on a topic you have delved in to in some depth. so i want to ask you first about your reaction to the criticism that the accountability review board has had. chairman issa said that it was either incomplete or in fact
9:15am
just wrong. can you respond to that first? >> well, i'm waiting to see whether there's any there there, candy. i've looked at it very carefully. i've listened to the hearings. a number of the criticisms were not based on the actual happenings. we did of course see the secretary. we saw secretary byrnes, we saw deputy secretary and interviewed pat kennedy. a number of the questions they raised, were we capable and were we complete? and i believe that we still were. i'm kind of waiting to hear the number of things that greg hicks raised. we interviewed greg. i admire greg. he did a very great job under difficult circumstances. answered himself, were the airplanes there, could they come, could they be there in time? he already indicated that the defense attache told him was not possible. any report is subject to being
9:16am
reviewed, to being criticized and all the rest. i welcome that, but i don't yet see it. >> and the main question -- i want to play something for you. and this was greg hicks, former deputy chief of mission in libya. and he was asked about could help have been sent. he mentioned this group that was in the embassy in libya that wanted to go to the mission in benghazi. here's the question. >> how did the personnel react at being told to stand down? >> they were furious. i can only say -- well, i will quote lieutenant colonel gibson. he said this is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more [ bleep ] than somebody in the military. >> here's the bottom line question, were there military assets anywhere that could have saved these men? the implication here is that there was, that possibly lives did not need to be lost had the military acted more quickly.
9:17am
>> that group would have arrived after everybody had left the benghazi airport, but a few. the airport was secured. there were 80, according to the testimony, libyan armored vehicle and people there securing the airport. so there was no doubt about that. >> the airport in benghazi. >> the airport in benghazi. which was the extensable reason for going. they were helpful to treating the wounded when they arrived. candy, we looked at that very thoroughly. mike mullen, who was part of this report and indeed worked very closely with all of us and shared many of the responsibilities directly with me made it very clear that his view, as a former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, that there were nothing within range that could have made a difference. >> but of course the military would have been responsible for that. but the military opinion is nobody could have gone in there. >> that's correct. and general dempsey, his
9:18am
successor, repeated that in hearings. >> there was a question whether they could do a flyover just to scramble some of these. >> the closest flyover possibility was identified in aviano, northern italy, 1600 miles away. that was given a two-to-three hour possibility. but it would also require aircraft tankers to refuel those aircraft and they were not available. >> the other complaint was that this report of yours -- accountability review board, only went so far. you did heavily criticize the state department for not responding to what had been obvious threats and obviously unsettled conditions particularly in benghazi but in libya as a whole, but only went so far as the assistant secretary that the buck really stops with secretary of state hillary clinton. is that not true? and why didn't you discuss this with her? >> the buck stopped. she'd already made it clear that the buck stopped with her. we were interested in where the
9:19am
decisions were made. and she did not make the security decisions that we felt -- >> was that a problem, do you think? >> no, not at all. i think it was behind the legislation. we looked in to what the congress was saying at the time it passed the legislation to set up the process. and they said it is traditional for heads of agencies to take responsibility then nobody goes down and finds where the decisions were made. and that's what we'd like to see. and we would like to have people held responsible for those performance in those decisions. >> what do you make of the back and forth on the talking points which we know were scrubbed of any kind of mention of terror and certainly when u.n. secretary rice came on this show and four others it was all about this tape and that's what they thought at the time. what do you make of that? >> candy, that was not in our mandate. we were looking into security, security warnings, security capacity, those kinds of things. so i have been very clear since it wasn't our mandate, i didn't do the investigation.
9:20am
and i'm not prepared or able to give you a thought on that. >> did you learn anything new in the hearings this week that you did not know at the accountability review board? >> i wish i could say yes because i'm always interested in seeing what's new. i honestly did not. >> as far as you are concerned you think benghazi has been investigated and that information put out to the public as thoroughly as possible? >> no. because the fbi is responsible for the criminal investigation. and that's ongoing. and i think you have to separate the two. ours was securities. their's is criminal. that is yet to be done. we may find out much more. they're obviously interested in who perpetrated this, for what reasons? were they criminally culpable under u.s. law? those kinds of things, yep. >> okay. ambassador pickering, thanks for coming, appreciate it. up next, stunning and disturbing numbers of sexual assaults in the u.s. military.
9:21am
>> bottom line is, i have no tolerance for this. i have communicated this to the secretary of defense. your day to unplug. with centurylink as your technology partner, our visionary cloud infrastructure, and dedicated support, free you to focus on what matters. centurylink. your link to what's next. by going low. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 like offering schwab etfs tdd# 1-800-345-2550 with the lowest operating expenses tdd# 1-800-345-2550
9:22am
in their respective lipper categories -- tdd# 1-800-345-2550 lower than ishares tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and vanguard. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and with all our etfs commission-free tdd# 1-800-345-2550 when traded online in a schwab account, tdd# 1-800-345-2550 it leaves our investors with more money to invest. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 something they've come to count on with us. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 so as investors continue to set their portfolio goals high, tdd# 1-800-345-2550 we help keep their costs of investing low. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 give us a call and open an account today. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 carefully consider prospectus information, including tdd# 1-800-345-2550 investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 request a prospectus by calling schwab at 800-435-4000. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 read it carefully before investing. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 fees and expenses apply. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 investing involves risks, including loss of principal. tdd# 1-800-345-2550
9:23am
9:24am
9:25am
a new report on sexual assaults in the military paints such an alarming picture, even the secretary of defense seems worried about his department's ability to fix it. >> this department may be nearing a stage where the frequency of this crime and the perception that there is tolerance of it could very well undermine our ability to effectively carry out the mission. >> the troubling development is sparking outrage and a flurry of proposed legislative fixes on capitol hill, including one that would take sexual assault complaints outside the chain of command, which is a fundamental feature of military life. the idea is opposed by the pentagon and some leading voices on capitol hill, but it sounds about right to our next guests, two women, who are members of congress, and war veterans. tammy duckworth, one of the first women in the army to fly combat missions.
9:26am
she lost both legs when the blackhawk helicopter she co-piloted was hit by a rocket propelled grenade. and tulsi gabbert was handling logistics and operations for 3,000 troops. captain gabbard and lieutenant duckworth were both elected to congress last november. they continue to serve in their national guard units. congresswoman gabbard and duckworth on the culture, reasons and remedies to stop military assaults, next. dave'so when he retires -- keep working, but for himself. so as his financial advisor, i took a look at everything he has. the 401(k). insurance policies. even money he's invested elsewhere. we're building a retirement plan to help him launch a second career. dave's flight school. go dave. when people talk, great things can happen. so start a conversation with an advisor who's fully invested in you.
9:27am
wells fargo advisors. together we'll go far. wells fargo advisors. it's been that way since the day you met. but your erectile dysfunction - it could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use
9:28am
and a 30-tablet free trial. have hail damage to both their cars. ted ted is trying to get a hold of his insurance agent. maxwell is not. he's on geico.com setting up an appointment with an adjuster. ted is now on hold with his insurance company. maxwell is not and just confirmed a 5:30 time for tuesday. ted, is still waiting. yes! maxwell is out and about... with ted's now ex-girlfriend. wheeeee! whoo! later ted! online claims appointments. just a click away on geico.com.
9:29am
9:30am
preventing sexual assault and taking disciplinary actions when it happens seems to me is a very high priority for us. >> the number of sexual assaults in the military is unacceptable. >> it's a threat to the safety and welfare of our people and the health, reputation and trust of this institution. >> there will be accountability. if people have engaged in this behavior, they should be prosecuted. >> joining me are two congresswomen who are also iraq war veterans, tulsi gabbard of
9:31am
hawaii, tammy duckworth of illinois. congresswomen, thank you so much for joining us. >> good to be here. >> you heard, as we came into this section, from our military leaders for more than a decade this has been a problem. and it is only increasing. we saw where reported rapes are up, the number of people who don't report them but say they have been at least the victims of unwanted sexual contact. what's wrong here? >> it's absolutely unacceptable, candy. i want the military to be a place where women can succeed and thrive the way i was able to. and the military leadership at this point have shown that they have not been capable of fixing this problem. >> not only that, but not been capable for a decade plus. >> absolutely. >> there's no more excuses. >> there is no excuses. it's not enough just to say this is not something we'll stand for, we'll hold these people accountable unless you're providing a system and process to actually do that. and i think there are two things we really need to look at.
9:32am
what is the core reason why this hasn't really gotten better over the years? one being we have to make sure it's a victim-centered response from the moment the victim makes that report all the way through the point where the perpetrator is prosecuted, charged and punished. and secondly, making sure we are investigating those who are retaliating and abusing their positions of command or power. >> a huge number of women who said they did report said they also felt retaliation careerwise or otherwise. >> this issue is a power issue, it's not a sex issue. it's a power issue. >> in a culture that's built on power and rank. >> it is. but, you know, the military because it's built on power and rank has the ability to fix it based on that same tradition of power and rank. commanders can put an end to this. and i am very, very disturbed that they have not been able to do this. look, we're both still serving. we're taking the courses and the classes the military is mandating. something is breaking down between the coursework that's happening and the education
9:33am
that's happening and what actually happens when somebody reports a problem. and that's where we need to be fixed. because after ten years, you have not solved the problem, done. we need to do something and we need to come up with a different system. >> did you see or feel or know of anything within this culture when you were serving? >> it has existed. it's hard to be in the military without being aware of it. during my first deployment to iraq, there was a heightened state of awareness because of incidences that were rising in the camp where we were. and we were trained and briefed at our level as soldiers on things to be aware of, travel in battle buddy teams, don't walk out alone even on the camp where theoretically you should be safe. >> where your colleagues are. >> exactly. >> did you feel it? do you know? it just seems that the culture somehow seems ripe for this in a way that's kind of inexplicable. >> i think my experience was a little bit different in that i was an officer. your first tour you were e-4.
9:34am
so the rank structure was a little bit different. i had a lot more power that came with me and i was able to exercise that. this goes back to empowering the female service members to stand up, to know that when they speak up that they will be listened to and they will be treated fairly. >> how do you do that? >> these predators seek out people who are weak targets. >> yes. >> i was not a weak target. it's not something i experienced personally. however, my command was one that was -- that did create this safe climate for people to be able to make those kinds of reports. but you can't make it based on, you know, the personalities or the strengths or weaknesses of any system commander, which is why the system has to be one that is safe, transparent and fair holding people accountable. >> so what is evident is that people are afraid to report. and what's being reported isn't being dealt with at a great percentage. tell me a couple of key things that must happen. because it sounds to me that both of you have lost faith in
9:35am
the military justice system being able to handle this. >> right. and, you know, candy, i am an absolute supporter of the ucmj, the uniform code of military justice and the commander, having been a commander and at times i was the only woman in an all-male unit being a commander that has full commander authority over your unit. but i think at this point in this instance of military sexual tra ma, military sexual assault, the military has shown it's not capable of fixes this problem. >> this is a big deal in the military, congresswoman gabbard, to take something out of the chain of command. that is the holy grail of military life. >> this is serious. this is serious. we're talking about the commander, right? someone has the ability to have that trust and confidence of their unit in them and their ability to lead and command and have that power, but understanding this is something that falls outside of that realm and also something that requires a check and balance so that there is not a single person who
9:36am
will be in a position to abuse that power that they have been entrusted with, which is huge. you're taking care of soldiers, you're taking care of service members. and having that independent investigative body, as well as having someone outside the chain of command, who doesn't have the power -- the commander should not have the power to overturn a jury's verdict. >> in these serious cases like this. >> exactly. >> and, again, this goes back, candy, to i think -- i've been a supporter of the system -- of the ucmj until this point. but this is such an aberration, this is horrendous, it's so unacceptable that this is time to take a next very serious step. >> so by serious steps, a, this chain of command thing you would no longer take a complaint of sexual advancement. let's say a good number of these are men as well. >> almost half. >> not just women. >> nonetheless, you could take this. you don't take this to your commander, you take this to an
9:37am
outside independent review still within the military and the commander could not overturn -- >> the outcome of the investigation or the outcome of the judicial process. >> and if you are found in the military to be guilty of sexual assault, unwanted sexual contact, rape, whatever degree you want, should you be thrown out of the military? >> yeah. it would be a serious -- if you're found guilty of rape or sexual assault, you should be thrown out. that's a serious charge. >> dishonorable discharge, something that will stick with this person for the rest of their lives. it doesn't just end their military career, any other job they try to get, this will be on their record. >> a federal job, state job, that will be there. >> that's right. >> let me ask you, we have this incident where an air force officer, who is in charge of the sexual assault unit, was arrested himself for sexual assault. we know nothing's been proven yet. your first reaction to hearing that news. >> i just -- >> shocked. >> nightmare. this is -- it's a betrayal of trust.
9:38am
it's a betrayal >> that's right. >> the military has said we're going to fix this problem. and we've seen the military try to fix this problem because we serve. and yet you appointed someone who is supposed to be fixing a problem who is a perpetrator, who is a predator. and this is not acceptable. >> completely undermines that trust that tammy's talking about. the trust that we're trying to build with this climate of understanding that you can safely go and report when you've been a victim of a heinous crime. and this really undermines whatever progress has been made over time. >> so, you know, discipline, honor, country, all of those things seem to me betrayed -- taking away not been yet convicted of anything. >> right. >> but it just seems this seems to be a bad thing to do in society, but in the military -- >> this is a betrayal. this is not only a crime against the victim, this is a betrayal to your unit, this is a betrayal to your nation. it is a betrayal to the entire structure. and that is simply not acceptable. i want women to serve.
9:39am
as women rise through the ranks because we can now serve in combat, we're going to get more women in leadership positions and i hope that will help as well. >> yeah. >> but, you know, this just has to be stamped out now. >> absolutely. >> first things you all say is take it out of the chain of command and second of all nobody can overturn the conviction. >> and having that victim-centered response. i think that's critical from start to finish making sure that that culture is there, that safe and transparent and accountable. >> congresswoman tulsi gabbard and tammy duckworth, thank you for being here. come back. we'll keep track of this. >> thank you. >> aloha. >> thank you. >> when we return, the brothers of accused cleveland kidnapper ariel castro speak exclusively to cnn. then our political panel on rand paul taking the fight to hillary clinton. [ driver ] today, my ambulance knew all about a bike accident,
9:40am
just by talking to a helmet. it grabbed the patient's record before we even picked him up. it found out the doctor we needed was at st. anne's. wiggle your toes. and it got his okay on treatment from miles away. it even pulled strings with the stoplights. my ambulance talks with smoke alarms and pilots and stadiums. but, of course, it's a good listener too. [ female announcer ] today cisco is connecting the internet of everything. so everything works like never before.
9:41am
[ female announcer ] today cisco is connecting the internet of everything. ó? before we get to our panel,
9:42am
a look at the day's headlines. the brothers of accused cleveland kidnapper and rapist ariel castro are speaking out in an interview with cnn's martin savidge airing tomorrow morning. pedro and onil castro say they are grateful three women and 6-year-old girl are now free and safe. cleveland police say ariel castro's brothers had nothing to do with the abductions. the three women held captive for a decade are asking for privacy so they can continue to heal and reconnect with their families. in statement read by their attorney, amanda berry, gina dejesus and michelle knight said they are grateful for the support by the cleveland community and will not give interviews until the criminal case against castro has been tried. coming up at the top of the hour, a special fareed zakaria gps in beyond the manhunts, how to stop 0 terror. he speaks to some of the women involved in the hunt for osama bin laden. and later, paying tribute to
9:43am
the one person everyone in washington likes. the american dream is of a better future, a confident retirement. those dreams have taken a beating lately. but no way we're going to let them die. ♪ ameriprise advisors can help keep your dreams alive like they helped millions of others. by listening. planning. working one on one. that's what ameriprise financial does. and that's what they can do with you. that's how ameriprise puts more within reach. ♪ try e-mail marketing from constantcontact. it's the fastest, easiest way to create great-looking custom e-mails that bring customers through your door. sign up for your free trial today at constantcontact.com/try.
9:44am
9:45am
...and we inspected his brakes for free. -free is good. -free is very good. [ male announcer ] now get 50% off brake pads and shoes at meineke. joining me now, democratic strategist thank you all for joining us. little something here on the irs -- new irs statement on the targeting of groups with the name tea party or patriot in their name. in the timeline it shows as early as 2011 senior officials knew this. the irs has just put out a statement saying irs senior leadership was not aware of this level of specific details at the time of the march 2012 hearing when the commissioner told congress that there was no targeting of people.
9:46am
the timeline does not contradict the commissioner's testimony. while exempt organization officials knew of the situation earlier, the timeline reflects the irs senior leadership did not have this level of detail. the timeline supports what the irs acknowledged on friday that mistakes were made. there were not partisan reasons behind this. let's begin with mistakes were made. it has such a ring because there's no kind of ownership of mistakes were made. there's no subject matter to this sentence. how big a deal is this? >> well, i think it's a blow for the president. you know, the irs's slogan should not be we've got all it takes to take all you've got. and this is the coercive power of government. the president and the state of the union from then on has made the case government is this big warm fuzzy thing is all of us working together as a community. and here we see the other face of government, big old top down coercive power which is easily runs amuck. so politically this undermines his message.
9:47am
>> and can they get some distance out of this? you have to admit, carl levin said we have to look in to this. this is not a great situation. they say, look, it was a small group of agents. it certainly wasn't some, you know, irs-wide thing. nonetheless it does sort of feed into republican story lines about what the obama administration is all about, big government. >> yeah. this is going to be a tremendous fund raising opportunity for republicans and tea party organizations all across the country. they're going to feed on this. but i do think there is universal concern with this. you do see democratic members on the hill raising concern with this. you saw the white house, you saw jay carney yesterday in his briefing say, you know, no, this isn't cool. this is something we've got to look at and figure out what went wrong. so i do think still early in this process but i do think there can be -- there should be investigation. and if it can be isolated to just a few people, i think the administration ends up being okay on this. >> we have what we call legs to a story.
9:48am
does it have legs? meaning will it play out over time in the headlines? some are suggesting that up against benghazi people understand and sort of relate to the irs coming in and, you know, looking at your books and that this might be more powerful. >> and while we don't know who knew what and when, the fact is the irs in particular has a history most infamously with richard nixon but going back to fdr's vendetta against andrew melon of being an agency that presidents have used to harass and punish their enemies. now, there were a lot of reforms passed after watergate that were supposed to make the agency more independent and accountable, but, again, it's the historic echoes i think that give this a real resonance and really do suggest the white house better get out ahead of this. >> and we should mention that a bush appointee was running the irs during the time -- first of
9:49am
all, he's the one that gave the testimony that said there's no targeting going on. no evidence at this point. we know so little, but it was a bush appointee. we need to point that out. move you to the other big story this week, which is benghazi. in particular alex, if you will for me -- the democrats are pushing back very hard on this saying nothing new. there's nothing new out there. this is all about politics. so i want to play for you rand paul something he said in iowa this week discussing hillary clinton's former head of the state department. >> they're asking for security. they're pleading for security. and they got nothing. it was inexcusable. it was a dereliction of duty. and it should preclude her from holding out her office. >> now, while i'm asking you this question, i want to put up an nrcc, a republican campaign committee, an ad they put up asking for funds saying, you know, we're after benghazi.
9:50am
is it smart to go after substantive things with rand paul in iowa attacking hillary clinton, who might run in 2016 and the irs making funds off of it. isn't that a mixed message. >> you undermine your motive. >> do you that think that has happened here? >> not yet. politics is also how we govern our governors. it's the only control we have. when government fails the political arena is the place that we want to expose something and bring it to people's attention. and this is bad news for hillary clinton. this could be what mission accomplished was for george bush. what difference does it make could be for hillary clinton. she didn't look after the people under her care in benghazi. she either allowed or encouraged or didn't know about a cover up and then she marked it with a youtube moment and those things last and travel in politics. this is going to make it very
9:51am
tough for her in 2016. >> youtube is pretty unforgiving. you work for hillary clinton. does this make life difficult for her? >> look, are there going to be questions about this? probably. there should be. this is an issue that is serious. should not be a political issue, though. and that is what the republicans are doing right now. just this morning, darrell issa says we're not targeting barack obama, we're not targeting hillary clinton. that ad up there had a picture of barack obama and hillary clinton. rand paul going to a republican dinner and making it about hillary clinton's perspective presidential campaign when no one knows if she is planning on running for president, it just makes the point that this really is political. add to that the fact that there isn't anything new that came out in recent days and it feeds the narrative that these guys are trying to pin it on her in order
9:52am
to score political points. >> it's hard to imagine the obama administration is criticizing anyone for being political when this administration has been out on the stump campaigning forever about everything. >> where does it go from here? has it damaged hillary? will it damage hillary clinton, should she decide to run? >> i think that, you know, it's going to be difficult for any democrat. there's sort of a history of a country not giving a presence, -- a president in essence a third term. but yes, i do think this will come back and haunt her again and again. and i disagree. there have been some new details that have come out on the kind of furious infighting that was happening and the fact that the first impulse was to protect the state department. >> right. it was about politics but it seems to be internal state politics not to get thrown under the bus by the cia for not paying attention to the security. thanks for joining us. coming up, honoring mom. from both sides of the aisle.
9:53am
>> after ten year. your day to unplug. with centurylink as your technology partner, our visionary cloud infrastructure, and dedicated support, free you to focus on what matters. centurylink. your link to what's next. man: how did i get here? dumb luck? or good decisions? ones i've made. ones we've all made.
9:54am
about marriage. children. money. about tomorrow. here's to good decisions. who matters most to you says the most about you. at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners, and they matter most to us. ready to plan for your family's future? we'll help you get there.
9:55am
that your mouth is under attack, from food particles and bacteria. try fixodent. it helps create a food seal defense for a clean mouth and kills bacteria for fresh breath. ♪ fixodent, and forget it.
9:56am
9:57am
finally this morning, from our getting to know web series. a salute to a nonpartisan group of people with extraordinary influence on the country's future. moms. we start with condoleezza rice who talked to us about growing up in the segregated south. >> my mother and i went to buy an easter dress and we went into one of the big department stores and the lady said, the sales lady said she'll have to try it on in there and pointed to a store room and my mother said, looking her dead in the eye, either she tries this dress on in the fitting room or we don't buy it. >> i was offered a job and she for my home state senator at the time and she gave me a nudge to take the job. because she was worried i would become a ski bum. >> what was the defining thing for you? >> a mother of unconditional love. a woman of an indomitable spirit to overcome.
9:58am
>> not only did she tell us to turn off the tv and start reading books, she was always struggling to learn how to read herself. she made us think that she could read. >> my mother used to put hot water bottles in bed to keep us warm and those post-war years in europe were interesting to watch the recovery. >> my mother used to say one of the many things she would say is, you know, you may be the first to do many things, but make sure you're not the last. >> my mother started a business in our house to support us and she taught dancing and decorum and it was the demint academy of dance and decorum. the worst thing was to be called downstairs to dance with someone who was 50 years old. >> i got out of the navy and
9:59am
doing jobs so that we could within a couple months we built up so much business we had to start late at night, which is good except my mom said don't sell any more doughnuts, rick. >> my mother, my mother gave me a cup of instant coffee probably when i was 10, 9 or 10 years old and i hated it. >> my mother was so spectacular. she knew women were capable of more things. every day, i think now f she lived today what she would be. >> from this mom to my mom and all the mothers out there watching, a very happy mother's day to you. thank you for watching "state of the union." i'm candy crowley in washington. head to cnn.com/sotu for analysis and extras, including our getting to know interview with susan collins on her strategic reasons for getting married in august. if you missed any part of today's show, you can find us on itunes. just search state of the union. fareed zakaria gps is next for our viewers here in the united states.
10:00am
welcome to a special edition of gps "beyond the manhunt: how to stop terror." i'm fareed zakaria . >> the united states has conducted an operation that killed osama bin laden. >> just two years ago that navy s.e.a.l.s in pakistan spoke the words geronimo and that meant osama bin laden was finally dead. today the fight continues. as we saw on boyleston street in boston. stepping back from the crisis, we also need to ask larger questions about the state of our security. what is the threat out there and are we prepared for it? >> he intended to use the

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)